The British prime minister, Sir Kier Starmer, has acclaimed a “new era” with the European Union by presenting a subsequent agreement to Brexit “restart” on Monday. However, opponents have accused the leftist government of “surrendering” to Brussels in key areas, including the grant of access to the block to the fishing waters of the United Kingdom for a decade.
In his third important agreement this month, after establishing agreements with India and the United States, Prime Minister Starmer Jacted That he has “rolled the sleeves to deliver for the British, the British works and the British companies.”
The broad EU agreement presented by the PM Anti-Bornxit will see the United Kingdom align with European standards on animal welfare and food in exchange for reducing punitive import controls of British food products sold in Europe. However, London also agreed to send money to British taxpayers to the EU as part of the agreement. While no specific figures were released, The times He informs that it will be “an appropriate financial contribution of the United Kingdom.”
In addition, the Labor Government was accused of selling British fishermen by giving Europeans access to the waters of the United Kingdom over the next 12 years. According to the British press, this was a last minute demand from Brussels during the weekend after the government announced that an EU agreement would finally be, generating accusations that Starmer bowed to hardball tactics for the good of political convenience. The government has tried to calm fears, announcing a coastal investment fund of £ 360 million.
However, the United Kingdom reform leader Nigel Farage, regretted that the agreement “is the end of the fishing industry.” Farge’s deputy, deputy Richard Tice, added: “Starmer has surrendered: blocking, broth and barrel. He has stirred the white flag and said goodbye to fishing in the United Kingdom.
“And my constituents in Boston and Skegness will be furious in the morning crazy if this news is true. It is incredible. The EU apparently requested four or five years, and Starmer has surrendered about 12 years. A hallucinating.”
It is likely that the agreement also see the signing of the United Kingdom to a form of the ‘EU Youth Mobility Scheme, which would allow EU migrants from 18 to 30 years to live and work in Britain for up to three years. While the agreement essentially took into account on the subject, since London is pressing for a hard limit in the entrances per year, critics warned that they will fade the native young people in Great Britain, despite Starmer’s vote to protect them from endless migration.
In turn, the EU has said that it will reduce border controls for British tourists and will allow them to use “electronic positions” to accelerate passport controls such as other European travelers after new biometric systems enter its place at the end of the end of this year. However, while Brussels will raise the restriction, it remains to be seen if the individual member states do the same.
The EU has also said that “the exchange of information” on illegal migration with the United Kingdom will deepen. However, it remains to be seen if this will include the Brussels biometric database on asylum applicants. There seems to be little progress to reach an agreement for Great Britain to send illegal migrants to the block, most of whom cross the La Mancha channel from the beaches of France.
Meanwhile, the two parties also agreed to a greater alignment in defense, which means that British troops could be deployed along with their European counterparts. The problem has stood out in the midst of the efforts led by French president Emmanuel Macron and Starmer to display a “coalition of the Paneuropea military force” willing to Ukraine as an alleged maintenance force of La Paz Shamiv and by Kyrijd by Kyrijd by Kyred to Bywred Bywreed byte byrijd a bywreed by Kyist. Critics have warned that the foundations for the formation of an EU Army completely incipient could be laying.
Moving the agreement, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, said: “Now we are turning the page and opening a new chapter, a new chapter that is so important in these times, the emergence of geopolitical tensions but values of related ideas.” “
Prime Minister Starmer added: “In uncertain times and a new era for defense, security and commerce, we will strengthen our relations with allies worldwide, including, of course, with Europe. That’s what it is today, to move on the old rancid debates, looking forward, not the other way around, focusing on what we can do together to fulfill national interest.”
Former conservative cabinet minister Sir Simon Clarke criticized The agreement as a “triumph of elite concerns: youth mobility, 5 minutes faster by the Tuscany airport in summer) over those of the working class Great Britain.”
Sir Simon said that elites in London will not have to face the consequences of opening more EU migrant work or the impact of “fishing fields that are crowded by super French or Spanish drags.” The former conservative deputy continued to warn that, through the acceptance of EU EU standards and regulations, the agreement also feels the foundations for future arguments so that the United Kingdom joins the block.
The agreement and its ramifications will probably serve as an important campaign problem, with the leader of Brexit Nigel Farage, promising to cancel the agreement if he is elected as the next prime minister.
“The prime minister believes that he will escape, but maybe he underestimates how strong Brexit is still on the red wall,” Farage said during the weekend. “The whole issue is an abject surrender of Starmer and Political, something that will regret it.”
