It is the new anger not in my backyard and the last blow to the New York green energy agenda.
New Yorkers are aligning in opposition to the doses of new lithium -ion battery storage facilities planned in the large block and beyond, about the fear that they can trigger toxic inferns in residential neighborhoods.
Queens councilor, Robert Holden, said he does not want his neighborhood to become a potential “mini-crernobyl”, a reference to the disaster of the nuclear energy plant in UCRINE on April 26, 1986 that released an amount of mass or forced the evacuation and forced material.
“Why are we putting our children in a dangerous situation?” The average life of a lifetime and the mother who stays at home, Graceann Faulkner, told the post in a recent protest of a Nosedot energy battery warehouse.
The site, which is now vacant in 64-30 69th Place, is next to a nursery and present (Books & Rattles, Inc.), the Juniper Valley Animal Hospital and is also located on the other side of PS 128 street.
Faulkner said he would take out his fifth grade daughter, Christina, of PS 128, if the plans for the ease of battery storage are coming.
The spokeswoman for Ninedot Energy, Karen Alter, when she was contacted by the position, said the Brooklyn company had not made a “final decision to advance.”
In a copy of emails with community officials obtained by the position, Ninedot responded to Sam Brill defended the safety of such battery sites, including a NineDot battery installation in the Bronx, which for years has “operated” 40 feet from a public school.
“Fdny wouldn’t let us build thesis if they hurry,” Brill said.
The confrontation is an increasingly common view in the five districts with the locals who complain about potential inlays that would be difficult to publish, as demonstrated by the explosions of battery storage in California.
The California Public Services Commission recently adjusted the security rules for these facilities after fires that threw toxic smoke.
The batteries store energy, mainly of emerging solar and wind energy, to help New York meet the objectives under the very critical climate law of 2019 approved by the then GOV Andrew Cuomo-Now, a candidate for mayor.
According to the Plan, New York must reduce greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030 and have 100% zero emissions electricity by 2040. The rules require New York to generate 9,000 megawatts of wind energy on the high seas by 2025 and Bulardd storage by 2030.
“Energy storage will help achieve the aggressive objective of the Climate Leadership Law and Community Protection to obtain 70% of New York Electricity from Renewable Fuentes by 2030”, the New York Nys Research and Research Authority. [NYSERDA] Saying.
But the objectives are unwavering, admit the defenders of equally clean energy.
The Public Service Commission, mostly customized by the commissioners designated by Governor Kathy Hochul, has the authority to locate the battery storage facilities of the battery with a capacity of at least 80 megawatts.
But officials in New York City and other locations have the authority to approve or reject battery storage facilities with less capacity as 80MW, which repeats most of the projects, according to the PSC.
There are 74 existing battery storage facilities in the city: 18 each in Brooklyn and Manhattan, 16 in Queens and 11 on Bronx Island and the United States, according to the Nyerda website.
Throughout the state, there are 6,304 of these projects.
The republican candidate for the mayor’s office, Curtis Sliwa, said that anger against battery storage stores is a sleeping giant problem that could promote it to victory in the career for the City Council, comparing it with the opposition to prisons and migrants based on the municipality.
“They are putting them in residential areas. The wrath of the residents … is palpable,” Sliwa said during an interview of the posterior editorial board.
If the facilities could influence the mayor’s career, plans for new warehouses are local.
“They just found a cheap country from Avia, but our lives are not cheap … … Our Ownren are not cheap,” said Brooklyn assemblyman Michael Novakhov, after leading a Rally on April 6 against the installation of a lithium ion. In Severesend.
There is also a tough opposition to numerous battery storage sites in Staten Island.
One of those facilities is located in Nelson Avenue between a service station and a house, said the president of the island County, Vito Fossella, who is looking at a lawsuit to block the projects.
“Battery storage facilities should not be located next to people’s houses or service stations,” said Fossella.
He said that the pressure to comply with climate law is to put health and safety at risk.
“It’s clearly a hurried job,” said Fossella. “We are not crying Wolf. This is a danger that expects to happen.”
State officials insisted that battery storage sites are safe.
The city’s energy storage regulations prepared by the department of FDNY and buildings “are widely considered among the strongest in the country” and have been adopted for state projects by the firefighted fire security group between governor agencies, a Nyerda, a Nyerda.
The working group has issued recommendations that “prioritize the safety of all New Yorkers and reaffirm New York’s commitment to the safe deployment of energy storage, positioning New York as a national leader in battery storage safety”, Nyerda. “The Nyerda.
